![]() ![]() Earlier this year, the company announced plans to increase its image database to 100 million images in order to soon be able to identify every person on Earth. Clearview, however, does not seem to be impressed by any of this. In Canada, the operation of the service was banned in some provinces. The UK regulator already imposed a fine of around eight million euros. The French fine is not the first imposed on Clearview. Should the company fail to pay or otherwise respond, the penalty increases by 100,000 euros for each day the deadline is missed. Ultimately, Clearview has now been fined 20 million euros – the maximum penalty envisaged. The authority took all of this into account when determining the fine. Clearview thus once again violated the GDPR, which stipulates an obligation to cooperate with competent authorities. For example, forms were said to have been incomplete or not filled out at all. This in turn set in motion a sanctions process in which Clearview did not sufficiently cooperate with the authority. Clearview did not respond to the two-month deadline. It was also ordered to delete all existing data of French nationals. The company was ordered to stop collecting and using the data of French citizens. In addition, the company disregards the right of data subjects to access and delete data collected about them.Īs a result, CNIL issued a warning against Clearview. For example, the company is processing all the data it works with unlawfully, as there is no consent from the data subjects and no other legal basis. In the course of the investigations that were initiated, CNIL determined that Clearview was in double violation of the GDPR. The authority was approached by both private individuals and the Privacy International organization. In France, the data protection authority CNIL is investigating, and according to its own information, it received its first complaints regarding Clearview’s practices as early as May 2020. Since Clearview does not operate a branch in the EU, each EU country is itself responsible for prosecuting offenses that affect the scope of its laws. Clearview has therefore been under criticism for some time. Consequently, it is in effect a theft of data that is being put to unauthorized use, which in turn enables mass surveillance. The problem is that neither the websites scanned nor the people depicted in the photos have ever given their consent to the practice. ![]() ![]() ![]() This does indeed seem possible, as the company probably has more than 20 billion photos at its disposal. Clearview offers access to its own database and algorithm primarily to law enforcement agencies, which are supposed to be able to identify wanted persons via a single photo. Furthermore, the photos were used to train a face recognition algorithm. To do this, the company systematically scans a considerable part of the Internet, extracts the data relevant to its purposes and stores them. Images collected from the InternetĬlearview collects photos of people found on websites, social networks or video platforms. Clearview proved uncooperative in the investigation. France has imposed the maximum fine allowed under the GDPR on Clearview AI, a company that unlawfully scanned faces and stored data collected in the process. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |